Matt Jones
Post Seven
“Uncle Walt’s Dream”: The Rise and Continued Domination of
Disney Animation
Although credited
for the first feature length cel-animated film, it was the business decisions
made by Walt Disney and his successors that made The Walt Disney Company an
entertainment juggernaut.
A) When one
thinks of animation, the name of Walt Disney is often at the forefront of the
discussion. And while there were many
individuals who contributed to the process and development of animation,
Disney’s saturation of the market deserves recognition. Although born in Chicago, IL, Disney’s family
moved to Kansas City, MO as a child and it was there that Disney began his
journey in animation by working at the Kansas City Film Ad Service, creating
short animated films which he called “Neuman Laugh-O-Grams” for a local theater
chain.
Soon
after, Disney moved to California and began a business relationship with
Margaret Winkler, a successful animation distributor in New York City. Winkler was fond of Disney’s series of
“Alice” films, which featured a combination of live-action and animation. Winkler was very fond of keeping the animated
films heavy on gags, and light on plot development. However, Disney felt he was capable of
creating more complex films. Eventually
the “Alice” series began to lose steam, and Disney introduced a new character,
the fully animated Oswald the Lucky Rabbit, now described as a combination of
Julius, the animated cat in the “Alice” films and what would become Mickey
Mouse. Eventually, after Margaret
Winkler married Charles Mintz, Disney was edged out of the company and away
from the character that he created, yet did not hold the rights to.
Ousted
out of the lucrative character that he had created, Disney along with his
brother Roy, Composer Carl Stalling, and Ub Iwerks created the animated short Steamboat Willie featuring the new character
that would become famous as Mickey Mouse.
While Disney partially recycled the appearance of Steamboat Willie, as
well as some of the gags contained in the short, the film was a rousing
success. Away from Mintz and Winkler,
Disney was free to structure his film in any manner he wished. This of course allowed him to further explore
narratives. This alone helped ensure
Disney’s dominance in entertainment. As
the sheer novelty of the animated film was waning, along with the preponderance
of simplistic sight gags in silent cinema, the rise of the sound cinema meant
that the audience expected more in the way of a narrative structure and a
comedy based in the spoken word.
This
success led Disney to produce the first feature-length cel-animated film, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in 1937. The film was groundbreaking on several
levels, not only being the first feature length cel-animated film, but also
going to great lengths to realistically capturing movement in its
animation. Stand-ins were used for the
dwarfs and a ballet dancer was used to animate Snow White’s movements. The results were astonishing and the film
became an immensely popular and profitable film, allowing Disney to set the
groundwork for what would become one of the top media conglomerates of all
time. Disney continued his model of
basing stories on folktales, fables, myths, and legends until present
time.
Disney,
despite his success was not immune from the production code that swept through Hollywood
in the 1930s. Cartoon characters were
forbidden from spitting, animals were not allowed to be seen relieving
themselves, and the villain was not allowed to escape without punishment. In response to his combination live-action/animated
film Song of the South (1946), Joseph
Breen suggested that Disney “take counsel with some responsible Negro
authorities...As I have already presumed to suggest to you, our Negro friends
appear to be a bit critical of all motion picture stories which depict their
people, and it may be that they will find in this story some material which may
not be acceptable to them.” (120) To me, this statement is at the same time
hilarious and sad. It is hilarious that
someone could actually believe that African-American’s at the time simply took
offense at their depiction in cinema simply to be contrary. And unfortunately, it is sad for the exact
same reason.
During
the Great Depression, Disney’s success allowed for a great number of people to
be employed, however, as the economy regained strength however, tensions
between the company and its labor intensified.
Disney fired a number of the union organizers before any actual
picketing occurred; however as a result, Disney lost a great deal of talented
artists.
Despite
their success in the feature length animated film, Disney began producing
live-action films and later fully adopted the process by the end of the 1940s.
Their success in film production allowed the studio to open a theme park,
forever changing the business of media manufacture and marketing.
Despite Disney’s expansion as a
business entity, concerns still existed regarding their representation of
women. The country as a whole was
changing during the 1970s and 1980s and the definition of what was considered a
“respectable woman”. Between 1989 and
2005, Disney produced eighteen feature length animated films, six of the films
featured primarily non-human characters, and thus issues of female
representations could not be adequately evaluate. However, the remaining twelve films presented
three categories for female characters: The Princess, The Good Daughter, and
the Tough Gal.
The Princess is evidenced in
characters such as Ariel in The Little
Mermaid and Jasmine in Aladdin. In most cases the princess is presented as
having no mother and is often an only child.
The Good daughter is evidenced in
the characters of Belle in Beauty and the
Beast and the eponymous character in Mulan.
The Tough Gal is evidenced in the
characters of Esmerelda in The Hunchback
of Notre Dame and Meg in Hercules.
While the expansion of roles and differentiations
in character presentation provided better female representation than was seen
in the past, there were still problems. Ariel
for example was convinced that a fork was actually a tool called a dinglehopper
and was used for combing hair. Despite
all evidence that this information was in fact wrong, Ariel continued to
believe it. Whether this was simply for
comedic effect, or if it was a true issue in representation is very much up for
debate.
B.) Given the
reading for this week I decided to view a Disney animated short: The Art of Skiing (1943) featuring the
character of Goofy.
This is an example of orthodox animation and serves as
how-to video with Goofy’s ineptitude as a skier providing much of the
humor. However, the evolution from mere
sight gags is shown in this short animated film, as the conflict between the
narrator’s dialogue and the actions of Goofy.
The nature of the instructional video (a well-known convention) and the
failure of Goofy to be instructed by it allows for a great display of
comedy. The fluidity of Disney’s
animation is also evident in this short film, providing for more humor.
C) I have had
the chance to speak to several SIU faculty members about the study of
intertextuality and how it relates to The
Simpsons. I feel that these
discussions are almost as valuable as journal articles and book sections as it
provides me the opportunity of gaining instant feedback.
No comments:
Post a Comment